Most link building fails quietly. The links go live, the report looks full, and six months later half the pages have been pruned, redirected or quietly stripped of their outbound references. We built this service around the opposite habit: place less, check more, and keep a record of every decision so nobody has to take our word for it.
From brief to report
- Re-check on a schedulePlacements are revisited long after they are invoiced. A link that vanishes in month four is our problem to raise, not yours to discover.
- Agree the shortlistYou see every publisher before we approach them, with the reasoning attached. Anything you are not comfortable with comes off the list and nothing is placed on a site you have not seen.
- Pitch, not blastEach publisher gets an individual approach about a specific idea. This is the slow part and it is the part that decides whether the placement is any good.
- Place in contextYour link goes where a reader would reasonably follow it, surrounded by text that makes the reference make sense. Position inside the article is negotiated, not left to chance.
- Write to their standardThe draft has to survive their editor, not ours. If it needs three rounds it gets three rounds — a piece that reads like filler undermines the link sitting inside it.
- Report with evidenceYou get the URL, the anchor, the date, the target page and a note on why that publisher was chosen. It is written to be forwarded to somebody who was not in the room.
Why this exists
Nobody here came from a link marketplace. The background is in editorial and in running sites that depended on traffic, which is a different set of instincts than optimising a placement count.
We have been doing this long enough to have made most of the available mistakes at our own expense. The process on this page is largely a list of things we now refuse to repeat.
This began as an internal tool for a small group of site owners who were tired of buying links and then auditing them afterwards. Most of the rules on this page exist because at some point we broke one of them and had to clean up after ourselves.
The publisher base
We would rather cover six niches properly than claim forty. If your sector is not one we know, we will say so rather than improvise with a general-interest blog.
Food and drinkMarketing and advertisingPets and veterinaryLogistics and freightEducation and trainingPhotography and designGardening and horticulture
Languages we run outreach in
- English (UK and US publishers)
- German
- Spanish
- Dutch
Our standards
- No placements you have not approved. You see the site, the page and the plan first, every time.
- No links in footers, sidebars or author boxes sold as editorial placements. If it is not in the body, we do not call it a body link.
- No promises about rankings. We control where links come from; nobody controls a search engine.
- No sites that exist only to sell links. If the archive is a wall of unrelated sponsored posts, we are not interested no matter what the metrics say.
- No link networks. A publisher that quietly links to forty unrelated clients is a liability you inherit.
- No publishers we would not read ourselves. It is a soft rule and it removes more candidates than all the hard ones together.
- No hiding a lost link. If a placement drops we tell you, we chase it, and if it cannot be recovered it comes off the invoice.
The report
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
You get a spreadsheet and a short written summary. The spreadsheet is the record; the summary is there so that whoever forwards it to a finance director does not have to interpret it themselves.
Ways to work together
Starter
- Small monthly placement count
- Publisher shortlist approval
- Contextual body links
- Full evidence report
- Scheduled re-checks
Audit
- Full profile read
- Competitor gap list
- Anchor distribution map
- Written recommendations
- No placement commitment
Growth
- Higher monthly ceiling
- Anchor plan maintained across cycles
- Multilingual publishers available
- Quarterly strategy review
- Priority on reclamation work
Scale
- Capped by our capacity, not your budget
- Dedicated publisher relationships
- Digital PR campaigns included
- White-label reporting
- Direct line to the person doing the work
Worth reading
Related work from the same team, with more detail on process and less on services: